top of page

Our conceptual framework and suite of geospatial indicators can empower decision-makers in the following ways:

Help identify communities that may be impacted most

Help prioritize resources and actions for preparedness, response, recovery, and adaptation planning

Provide increased awareness and tracking of sites/waste facilities that may be impacted by worsening extreme events

Assess financial impacts of climate change for contaminated sites/waste facilities

Inform communications for hazard mitigation, post-event response, and recovery

Assess broader resilience of natural, built and social infrastructure to extreme events

Community Vulnerability to Extreme Events:
Considering Waste Management Facilities

Dried up lake representing drought
Factories facing extreme heat conditions
Contaminated sites by the water surface at flood risk
Powerlines at risk from wildfire

The interplay of worsening extreme events, contaminated sites, and disadvantaged communities is a pressing but understudied source of risks to communities worldwide. ​A conceptual framework and suite of geospatial indicators can empower decision-makers to take effective action. ​Our method, framework, and indicators can be adapted and applied worldwide.​

Community members awaiting emergency response / evacuation due to wildfires
Coastal flooding impacting infrastructure
Warning sign for extreme heat exposures
Dried up water stream representing drought

Conceptual Framework

Conceptual framework showing pathway between extreme events, sites and communities. Extreme events (Box 1) increase the risk of contaminant release from sites/waste facilities (Box 2), which are then transported via air and water (Box 3) potentially exposing nearby communities. Impacts may be higher for community populations who are more sensitive (Box 4).

Extreme events (Box 1) increase the risk of contaminant release from sites/waste facilities (Box 2), which are then transported via air and water (Box 3) potentially exposing nearby communities. Impacts may be higher for community populations who are more sensitive (Box 4). Mappable indicators representing each of these four boxes can help address community planning needs.

Source: Sinha, P., Fry, M., Julius, S., Truesdale, R., Cajka, J., Eddy, M., Doraiswamy, P., Albright, R., Riemenschneider, J., Potzler, M., Lim, B., Richkus, J., & O’Neal, M. (2024). Building resilience to extreme weather events in Phoenix: Considering contaminated sites and disadvantaged communities. Climate Risk Management, 43, 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2024.100586

bottom of page